The Fall Of Western Man Essay Research

The Fall Of Western Man Essay, Research Paper

The Fall of Western Civilization

A new revolution is required– a Western revolution. The values of Western civilization are lost, it’s morals murdered and it’s society turned sour. Something has changed. Currently, man is absorbing empty, worthless material. This idea of “pop culture” has been injected into the Western man. His values and morals have depreciated greatly. He has entered a black hole filled with expendable amounts of junk. In it, he is so severely sedated with endless amounts of indoctrination that a transformation is highly improbable. Indeed, Western society is in trouble. But why has is turned into an useless trashcan. Why are the mentalities of these individuals so twisted, so immoral, so depraved. Prior to 1900, mankind was at the mercy of a moral order. There was evidence of a moral imperative. So why is there such a drastic change in society within a century of time. The answer is God. God has not changed us with his power; rather we have changed ourselves with the lack of faith for Him. Religion was the base structure in the support of humanity. Many pieces of ideas concerning standards, principals, values and ideals were mended into many coherent pieces of art because of the faith in God. Society acted as though their every word, every decision and every move reflected their chance for salvation. They had a goal, an ambition, too prove to God that they were ethical. Certainly, there was a moral imperative. However, through the false assumption of The Enlightenment and the Scientific and Industrial revolutions, something has changed. The assumption of The Enlightenment was that even peasants could transform themselves into aristocrats, that given a choice, they could as well enjoy the niceties of an ambitious morally bound society. This was proven wrong because not everyone wanted the pleasure of being a part of the aristocracy. The Scientific Revolution changed humanity with critical inventions from Edison, Burbagge, Descartes and many other visionaries. The industrial revolution also contributed to degeneration of utility within our communities. It created a boom in population, which imposed overpowering demands on all aspects of our already struggling society. I will demonstrate the critical state of Western culture through exploring three significant examples from C.S Lewis’ essay about the Law of Human Nature, William C. Booth’s essay on proper essay writing, and a Toronto Star article pertaining to the tragedy of the Western world.

In C.S Lewis’ essay, he presents to us his vision on the subject of morality. He states the Law of Human Nature. He uses the analogy of a “non-thinking” object (a stone) and a human being to compare both of them to the law of gravitation. “The idea was that, just as falling stones are governed by the law of gravitation and chemicals by chemical laws, so the creature called man also has his law- with this great difference, that the stone couldn’t choose whether it obeyed the law of gravitation or not, but a man could choose either to obey the Law of Human Nature or to disobey it.” Lewis deems that man.s morality is administered by ethics–to know what is right and wrong. Lewis then proceeds to examine all the factors concerning this Law of Human Nature. First, he explains how the Law of Human Nature used to be called the “law of nature”. Thinkers before Lewis assumed that people obeyed it and was aware of the nature of the law. He states, “They called it the law of nature because they thought that every one knew it by nature and didn.t need to be taught it. Taking the race as a whole, they thought that the human idea of Decent Behavior was obvious to everyone. And I believe they were right.” Next, he makes clear some people think that the Law of Human Nature is unstable because different civilizations have quite different moralities. Not all men are quite different; they are only slightly different. He grasps on the point that because every man knows and understands the law, other societies engage to exemplify irrelevant ways of expressing ethics– they all act slightly different. Furthermore, he deciphers the critical aspect about selfishness. “Selfishness has never been admired. Men have differed as to whether you should have one wife or four. But they have always agreed that you mustn’t simply have any woman you liked.” Selflessness is what we must strive for to achieve a strong sense of apposite morality, yet the remnants of the world believe the opposite. We must not be fooled. Establishing this law into the masses is almost impossible. “None of us really follow the Law of Nature.” He tells us, that almost every day we have failed to practice ourselves the kind of behaviour we expect from other people. “The point is that they are one more proof of how deeply, whether we like it or not, we believe in the Law of Human Nature. If we did not believe in decent behaviour, why should we be so anxious to make excuses for not having behaved decently. The truth is, we believe in decency so much– we feel the Rule or Law, pressing on us so that we can’t bear to face the fact that we’re breaking it, and consequently we try to shift the responsibility.” He tries to make the point that humans know and understand the law of nature and yet they still break it. This exemplifies how man understands and is knowledgeable of these laws yet still acts immoral. Man is given a choice–ye