Keith Porter Is Gay Essay Research Paper

Keith Porter Is Gay Essay, Research Paper

As they look over the world’s painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly follow through on the critical work that has already begun. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither Mr. Gay Keith Porter nor his current rung on the ladder to total power. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care — a large enough number to improve the physical and spiritual quality of life for the population at present and for those yet to come. On the surface, it would seem merely that his position that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy is based upon a specious argument without any substantive basis. But the truth is that the real question here is not, “Why does he want to create massive civil unrest.”. The real question is rather, “Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that he is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club.” The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I’ve answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I’ll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I’ll just say that he wants to goad paltry pamphleteers into hurling epithets at his enemies. Who does he think he is. I mean, I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to tell him where he can stick it. Of course, I have to wonder where he got the idea that it is my view that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash. This sits hard with me, because it is simply not true, and I’ve never written anything to imply that it is. If we don’t soon tell Gay Keith to stop what he’s doing, he will proceed with his hypocritical ramblings, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Gay Keith our permission to do so.

So far, this letter has merely identified the ways in which he believes that going through the motions of working is the same as working only because he has a need to believe that. Now, let me shift gears and start telling you about how he thinks that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator’s purpose. However, he is unable to see any issue in a broad perspective or from more than one side. What Gay Keith fails to mention in his arguments is actually quite telling. For example, did you know that Gay Keith wants to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity — family, class, private associations. Or that the Gay Keith Porter Foundation’s latest report on judgemental recidivism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association.

If I said that it is villainous to question his sophistries, I’d be a liar. But I’d be being totally honest if I said that all Gay Keith really wants is to hang onto the perks he’s getting from the system. That’s all he really cares about. People have pointed out to me that he makes assertions that strain credulity, but I still can’t help but think that by refusing to act, by refusing to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his crusades might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational, we are giving him the power to let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior. Is there anyone else out there who’s noticed that everything Gay Keith tells you is a lie. I ask because he has recently been going around claiming that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.

He is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. Just think: Whenever anyone states the obvious — that the word on the street is that Gay Keith’s apparatchiks are profoundly influenced by what Gay Keith says and does — discussion naturally progresses towards the question, “What is it about our society that makes brazen usurers like Gay Keith desire to resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution.” Any honest person who takes the time to think about that question will be forced to conclude that it will not be easy to criticize his ideals publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that, for the overriding reason that I overheard one of Gay Keith’s disciples say, “People are pawns to be used and manipulated.” This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the “us/them” dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to address a number of important issues. Regardless of what Gay Keith seems to suspect, the word “honesty” does not exist in his vocabulary. Within a short period of time, he might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that I didn’t want to talk about this. I really didn’t. But I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that this is a fine example of what I’ve been talking about. What I mean is that all the deals Gay Keith makes are strictly one-way. Gay Keith gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.

While we may all pray for a perfect utopian world in which everyone is