Chernobyl Syndrome Essay Research Paper THE CHERNOBYL

Chernobyl Syndrome Essay, Research Paper

THE CHERNOBYL SYNDROME

by Olivia Ward

Moscow Bureau

Ten Years After the World’s Worst Nuclear Accident, the

Ukrainian Plant Is Still Generating a Lot of Heat

CHERNOBYL–Sometimes, on a good day, Victor Ivanov forgets

the moment that exploded his life. The heat, the

metallic-tasting smoke, the jolting shock of realization:

Something has gone wrong. Something has blown up. Something that

will burn itself forever into the mind and the body.

That was April 26, 1986, the day a computer program of the

Chernobyl number four reactor ran amok during an experiment and

caused a blast that spewed radiation over Ukraine, Belarus and

Russia, and millions of people worldwide.

The Earth’s biggest nuclear disaster, releasing 200 times

the radioactivity of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs

combined.

But now the 51-year-old Ivanov is back at Chernobyl–the

new cyber-age Chernobyl that presents a smooth and successful

face to the world.

Like 12,000 others, he is drawing a daily living from the

surviving part of the plant that has brought anxiety, sickness

or death to unaccounted numbers of people.

“Why do I stay here.” says the soft-spoken nuclear

technician who lost his home, some of his neighbors and his

health in the catastrophe. “It’s very simple. I like the work–

and I have nowhere else to go.”

Ivanov and his fellow workers are part of Chernobyl’s

weirdest paradox: The plant that hit Ukraine with billions of

dollars in social and safety costs since 1986 is now the

country’s leading industrial moneymaker.

That’s the reason why, in spite of multi-billion-dollar

pledges made at this month’s G-7 meeting of industrial nations,

the ailing plant may never be closed down.

“Things are much safer these days,” says Ivanov with a wan

smile. “It used to take 16 seconds to respond to an urgent

situation. Now it takes only two.”

The directors recite this like a litany. Everyone at the

plant wants to believe what their directors say. Chernobyl is

not only safe now, they insist, but one of the world’s 20 most

secure power stations.

“Security is our first priority,” says Vladislav Gavrilin,

the plant’s deputy director. “Last year, we were able to lower

emission levels twice. And we’re still lowering them.”

These assurances are at odds with the conclusions of

several international organizations that have studied

Chernobyl’s two remaining operating reactors and the leaking

sarcophagus covering number four.

Last year, the United States energy department reported,

“today conditions at the Chernobyl nuclear plant are in many

ways worse than those that existed prior to the disastrous

accident. Serious problems abound in nearly every facet of the

operation, raising the spectre of another accident.”

Plant officials speak optimistically about improving safety

by reducing human error. But according to most experts, the root

causes of the continuing danger at Chernobyl are basic

structural faults.

The RBMK-design reactors–15 of them still functioning in

East Europe and the former Soviet Union–have no containment

system for radiation in case of an accident.

Because they’re built around an unstable graphite core,

they are difficult to control in emergency situations,

dangerously susceptible to fires and in need of elaborate

control systems to prevent them from heating up and exploding.

Furthermore, the damaged reactor number four is covered by

a “sarcophagus” that is badly cracked and oozing radiation,

despite a patch-and-paint job undertaken by the plant.

Scientists fear that movement of nuclear fuel left in the

base of the reactor could touch off another thermal blast.

At least 50 feet away from the reactor, Geiger counters

begin to beep frantically. Instead of registering a normal 0.14

units of radiation, they jump to more than 5.0, a level that

should not be tolerated for more than a couple of minutes.

But, says the Ukrainian environment ministry’s nuclear

adviser Konstantin Rudy, the most immediate problem is spreading

contamination.

“Our main worry is water. The plains around the River

Pripyat (near Chernobyl) are contaminated. We expected flooding

this year, and if the Pripyat pours radiation into the Dnieper,

more than 20 million people will have polluted drinking water.”

A week after the interview, water levels rose and health

authorities were making evacuation plans for areas around the

runoff.

Ukrainians and their neighbors are not the only ones

troubled by the Chernobyl nuclear monster.

The West has pledged $2.3 billion in aid to close the plant

by the year 2000, including the development of two new reactors

to replace C

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать