Doctor Assisted Suicide Das Euthanasia Essay Research

Doctor Assisted Suicide (Das) Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper

Doctor assisted suicide (DAS) Euthanasia

Death with dignity, isn’t that the way we all dream of dying. Almost every family has had to watch the slow and agonizing death of a beloved family member from cancer, neurological disease, or other terminal illness. This is where doctor assisted suicide (DAS) steps in. Wouldn t it be nice if we could just stop the pain and misery of a loved one. When they only have a few months to live and they are in constant pain, wouldn t you want to stop that. If you answer yes, sorry, it s not going to happen very easily. DAS is still illegal in almost all of the states and is considered a crime in many of them.

I think that doctor assisted suicide should be a choice for people who are suffering and terminally ill.

Pro (for) Con (against)

1.Saves money

- quote from Ms Clinton

- cost of keeping individuals on life-support systems

1.We shouldn t put a price on life

- one out of eight dollars

- euthanasing a pet

2.Freedom of choice

- Living wills

- already legal in Oregon and the Netherlands 2. It is God’s place to decide the time and place of a person’s death

- sixth commandment

- quote from Leviticus

3.Humane

- poll in January 1995

- quote from Gary Mark Gilmore

3.Unnatural

- doctors aren t always right

- two studies

1.(pro).Money is always an issue. Weather we would be talking about simple pleasures in life or the most important issues it always comes up. So of course, it is a big issue in DAS too.

(1) “For example,” explained Mrs. Clinton, “just look at all the money that is wasted in the Medicare program on the last six months of life!”

(2) The cost of keeping individuals on life-support systems is very high and when there is no quality in the person s life is it really worth it all. Many times, the individuals are in a coma and can live a long time, being totally unaware of their surroundings. Sometimes a family spends their entire life savings keeping someone alive. It is very expensive to keep a person on life support and insurance doesn t always cover it. even if she/he is in a coma or is in great pain and doesn t have the willpower to live anymore. Its hard to watch a loved one in pain and misery. When our pets are suffering and the quality f their life is poor we have the choice to end their life. Why can t we do the same with people.

2.(pro) Every person should have a choice when to end their life if it is not worth living. By not worth living I mean if they are terminally ill and suffering, not if they are just having a bad day, or week, or month.

(1) By 1990, forty states had passed laws that made “living wills” legal. Living wills make it legal for a competent individual to decide in advance that they wish to withhold life-support systems and medicines that would sustain their lives.. If an individual is declared “brain dead” by a licensed doctor, it is at the discretion of the family members to terminate the life-support system. Living wills are a great way to express how a person would want to be taken care of if they got into an accident and could not communicate. In the wills they can choose how to be treated and now also refuse treatment or they can choose do not resuscitate (DNR). The refusal of treatment is also one form of euthanasia that is called passive euthanasia. The other form of euthanasia is the lethal injection or other similar action which is called active euthanasia.

(2) On October 27, 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide, but

on 8 December 1994, the residents of Oregon passed a law similar to the Netherlands’ practice of euthanasia. Voters in Oregon passed Americas’ first euthanasia law. The law legalizes the prescription of lethal doses of medicine to terminally ill patients who desire to end their lives. The policy does have three conditions:

First: [at least] two doctors must agree the patient has less than six months to live.

Second: the patient must ask the physician for suicide assistance at least three times, and third time it must be done in writing.

Third: the doctor must wait at least 15 days after the first request and two days after the third request before writing a prescription. The law also states that the drugs must be self-administered. (http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/e/euthanas.htm)

3.(pro) Its hard to watch a loved one in pain. And DAS just shows the humane side of people in our society. Not many of us like to see pain and suffering and we want to relieve it if we can. DAS just seems like a natural way to go if life is not worth living anymore if you are terminally ill and suffering, life just gets too hard for some people. (1) In a poll taken in January 1995, sixty-six percent of the people surveyed felt that a person suffering ” great pain” or with “no hope of improvement ” has the right to end their own life (Worsnop 148).

“Death is the only inescapable, unavoidable, sure thing. We are sentenced to die the day we’re born.” -Gary Mark Gilmore

Death is a natural thing in life, it s going to happen no matter what. Shouldn t we be able to decide, if we are in pain, to end it. Life is no fun if you are in ch

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать