To Clone Or Not To Clone Essay

To Clone, Or Not To Clone Essay, Research Paper

When someone gets the cold, they seek medicine. When someone gets cuts and bruises, they seek medical attention. When someone breaks up with a lover, they seek another lover. In each of these situations, the person is able to find ways to compensate for their pains and sufferings through various techniques, therefore, curing that person of the problem. However in some cases, problems aren t always as easy to alleviate, sometimes it s the lack of proper technology that keeps the problem from being solved, and sometimes, it s scientific advancements and breakthroughs that are the key to all the problems. When someone is in a critical health condition in need of an organ, they will indeed seek for an organ transplant so that they are able live on. Cases like these aren t always guaranteed to have successful consequences. One of the most controversial issues is on the ethics of human cloning. Human cloning has been looked down upon, the issue has had its share of negative perspectives. Of course for every argument there are pros and cons. The issue at hand of whether or not medical practices such as human cloning should ever exist has remained the same: Should human cloning be allowed.

This controversial and global widespread argument concerning human cloning started since the successful triumph of cloning Dolly, a lab created sheep in Scotland. Ever since the achievement of Dolly, there has been an onslaught of many moral and ethical concerns regarding the medical risks of cloning as well as the threat to human rights, self-respect and individualism. This debate however has the greatest significance not as in the failures of cloning but rather the consequences of its success. This is what is being quarreled about. It is being argued that what would happen if clones became a reality and how would one be able to track or control the clone in case something happens. This new knowledge doesn t only come with risks, costs and benefits, but also the intricate degree of complexion and it also needs critical and careful considerations since results could last eternally and or alter the entire natural evolution.

Like most scientific developments, genetic-engineering biotechnology

is neither intrinsically evil nor inherently good. How this new knowledge

is applied is what matters. It cannot be applied, however, without

consideration of bioethical principles. And it cannot be objectively

evaluated in isolation from the various contexts in which it will be

applied (Fox 160).

The talk about human cloning is vast among the critics and medias point of view, which are mostly targeted on the danger side of the issue. The majority of the public perceive human cloning and research as an immoral matter, but they also have fear for the new and unknown.

Most popular discussions about cloning a human assume the worse

possible motives in parents, but why on earth make such assumptions.

Without evidence. If someone assumes that every person he meets is a

secret racist or anti-Semite, we say he is paranoid, or a misanthrope, or

warped. Why assume the worst motives when we are thinking about

morality. (Pence 65).

Not only has the idea of cloning humans been ridiculed, but as well as other scientific ideas and laws of nature and now the open vision of human cloning has begun to challenge society s values in relation to reproduction, as well as life. Prior to the modern day disputes of cloning, people have always thought about human cloning as mere science fiction, and now every time when the word cloning appears, most people think of just the harmful effects and all the bad things that human cloning can lead to such as cloning a swarm of mini Hitlers , or evil dictators such as Saddam Hussein might abuse human cloning and try to take over the world by constructing a super army of super soldiers.

There are many people who still think that cloning Hitler will also

mean repeating what he did. Scientists reassure the public that this is not possible, as for such historical events to be repeated, all the circumstances

that allowed Hitler to be what he was would have been repeated as well.

If Hitler was cloned and brought up in a well-to-do, happy family which

he enjoyed being in, this clone will not follow the footsteps Hitler as his background is no longer the same. However, he might become one who

can speak incredibly well and eventually become a well-respected leader

(Nili, 3).

This isn t science fiction. If one person can be cloned, an army can be so produced (Lester & Hefley 58). Cloning particular individuals such as Einstein, Gandhi and Beethoven, would produce individuals with the same genetic inheritances, but is not possible to replicate their environments or the historical contexts in which they lived and their greatness flourished (Nussbaum & Sunstein 149). Human behavior is a function of genetic endowment interacting with social and environmental forces (Nussbaum & Sunstein 271).

So where does morality and ethical principles stand in this issue. It has been mentioned and pointed out countless times that human cloning and research is not the way to go because it violates individual rights.

In thinking about originating humans by

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать