Leadership Theory Essay Research Paper According to

Leadership Theory Essay, Research Paper

According to Nathan F. Iannone, leadership can be defined as the art of

influencing, directing, guiding, and controlling others in such a way as to

obtain their willing obedience, confidence, respect and loyal cooperation in

accomplishment of an objective. Leaders are not born.sure there are some

gifts-traits-attributes, natural endowments that affect relative abilities.but

they are not born, they are made. Any reasonably intelligent person with enough

forcefulness to develop his/her ability to inspire others to follow him can earn

leadership status. Remember that we have both formal and informal leaders..

Being a Captain /Sergeant doesn.t make you a leader! Classic Leadership

Theory: Common Traits of Leaders. Booher and Watson refer to classic leadership

theory because it describes an approach to understanding leadership that by and

large is out of style. Nonetheless it is clear that one can learn a great deal

by studying the important personal ingredients in the leadership equation.

Studying the traits of great leaders became unpopular because it was and is

associated with the .great man. theory of leadership. This approach was

espoused in the 19th. and early 20th. Centuries, and asserted the leadership

qualities are largely inherited. This was called .trait theory.. Researchers

such as Mann and Stodgill found no consistent correlate between particular

traits and leadership. Later research, particularly more recent and more

sophisticated work has found a consistent and strong relationship between

certain traits and leadership. Possessing these core traits simply makes it more

likely that a person will take the appropriate action leading to leadership

success. Overhead #2 The Art of Leadership. What is the nature of leadership,

leadership is an art! As with any form of artistic expression, painting, music,

leadership is an art form in that it: · Is an expression of the

individual within the social and environmental context. · Reflects the

individual.s personality. · Can be easier to demonstrate and develop

when one has a talent for it. · Can be learned-you may have a talent for

it, you may not, either way, anyone can still become an effective leader.

· Is greatly enhanced through a disciplined regimen of learning and

feedback. Through science, we can study the elements of leadership and provide

valuable understanding into its nature. This enables us to determine where to

focus our leadership skills and abilities, as well as measure to some extent,

our effectiveness. However, the act of leading itself is largely unscientific

and is far more akin to practicing an art form than studying scientific

variables. Understanding both facets of leadership is crucial to your

development as a leader. For you as a leader, remember that leadership is an

art; your leadership is always a work in progress. OH #3 Leadership Styles. Many

people believe that there is one type of leadership that is most effective, and

if they can only develop that style, they would be effective as a leader. Some

leaders have one style, and honestly believe that it is best to stick with what

comes naturally. As with any art form, one has a number of tools at one.s

disposal. In leadership, these tools are different leadership styles. Although

certain situations call for specific styles, most situations call for a

combination of styles. The four general styles of leadership are: 1. Autocratic.

2. Participative. 3. Laissez-faire. 4. Variable. Autocratic also known as

authoritarian leadership is rule by authority. As a manager or supervisor, a

person is endowed with a level of authority, which is expected to be obeyed. An

autocratic leader rests on this fact, expecting his subordinates to comply.

Participative leadership is often referred to as democratic although democratic

processes (voting etc.) need not be present to constitute participative

leadership. Laissez-faire leadership (really non-leadership) is a hands off

approach. If the group.s goals are being accomplished under the management of

a LF leader, it is because the group members are self-motivated, demonstrate

effective teamwork, and exhibit expertise in their field. Variable leadership, a

precursor to .situational leadership. draws from a combination of the above

styles. Whether this form of leadership is effective depends on how each style

is applied at what time. The styles of leadership help us understand how people

go about practicing the art, the question how does our individual traits affect

our ability to do so. OH #4 Leadership Traits. Traits can be described as our

general orientation (paradigm) toward people and things. Regrettably we tend to

view ourselves, as the way people ought to be. That is problematic. This clouds

our judgment of ourselves and others, hindering our ability to ascertain

weak

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать