Moby Dick 2 Essay Research Paper Moby

Moby Dick 2 Essay, Research Paper

Moby Dick

The moral ambiguity of the universe is prevalent throughout Melville?s

Moby Dick. None of the characters represent pure evil or pure goodness.

Even Melville?s description of Ahab, whom he repeatedly refers to

“monomaniacal,” suggesting an amorality or psychosis, is given a chance to

be seen as a frail, sympathetic character. When Ahab?s “monomaniac” fate

is juxtaposed with that of Ishmael, that moral ambiguity deepens, leaving

the reader with an ultimate unclarity of principle. The final moments of Moby Dick bring the novel to a terse, abrupt climax.

The mutual destruction of the Pequod and the White Whale, followed by

Ishmael?s epilogue occupies approximately half a dozen pages. Despite

Melville?s previous tendency to methodically detail every aspect of

whaling life, he assumes a concise, almost journalistic approach in the

climax. Note that in these few pages, he makes little attempt to assign

value judgements to the events taking place. Stylistically, his narration

is reduced to brusque, factual phrases using a greater number of

semicolons. By ending the book so curtly, Melville makes a virtually

negligible attempt at denouement, leaving what value judgements exist to

the reader. Ultimately, it is the dichotomy between the respective fortunes of Ishmael

and Ahab that the reader is left with. Herein lies a greater moral

ambiguity than is previously suggested. Although Ishmael is the sole

survivor of the Pequod, it is notable that in his own way, Ahab fulfills

his desire for revenge by ensuring the destruction of the White Whale

alongside his own end. Despite the seeming superiority of Ishmael?s

destiny, Melville does not explicitly indicate so. On the contrary, he

subtly suggests that Ishmael?s survival is lonely and empty upon being

rescued: “It was the devious-cruising Rachel, that in her retracing search

after her missing children, only found another orphan.” (724) That single

instance of the appellation “orphan” as applied to Ishmael speaks volumes

when taken in light of the destruction of the Pequod and her crew.

Melville?s inclusion of Ishmael?s survival as an epilogue, a suffix

attached to the dramatic destruction of the Pequod, suggests that

Ishmael?s survival is an afterthought to the fate of Ahab and the rest of

his crew. Ishmael?s quiet words at the beginning of the chapter, “Why then

here does any one step forth? ?Because one did survive the wreck,” (723)

indicate a deep humility on Ishmael?s part. The question is then raised of why Ishmael is the sole survivor. It is

clear that Ishmael significantly differs with Ahab concerning their

respective perspectives of the White Whale. Ishmael clearly indicates in

the chapter “The Try Works” how disagreeable he finds the mission and

mentality of those around him: “?the rushing Pequod, freighted with

savages, and laden with fire, and burning a corpse, and plunging into that

blackness of darkness, seemed the material counterpart of her monomaniac

commander?s soul.” (540) Here, Ishmael breaks his usual detached

observancy and boldly divorces himself from Ahab?s mission and those whom

Ahab has recruited to aid him .

Ishmael further distinguishes himself from the rest of the crew by being

the sole non-exploiter of whales in general. Melville makes it clear early

on that Ishmael initially chooses to ship on the Pequod for the

experiential value of whaling. It has been indicated that his outlook on

the whale is the only significantly benign one. Whereas Ishmael is

terrified by the “whiteness of the whale,” Stubb sees economic gain in the

valuable whale oil, subtly hinted at by his overbearing gloating upon his

first kill. In the harpooneers, we see a violent savageness, even in

Queequeg?s otherwise loving nature. To Ahab, the whale is a emblem of pure

evil. Even prudent, rational Starbuck looks on the whale as a dumb animal,

which it is his duty to exploit. The terror that Ishmael perceives is a consequence of his own vague fear

of the whale?s “nothingness.” What Ishmael fears is the mystical,

terrifying manifestation of white in the natural world, coupled with its

subversion of the sense of purity attached to whiteness in the human

world. Ishmael is distinguished from the rest of the crew in his ability

to consider the perspectives of the others. In his role as narrator,

Ishmael?s ability to detachedly analyze the viewpoints of those around him

may be what saves him. Note also, that in his narration, Ishmael is the

one character to cast any reverence upon the grand scale of the whale.

Unlike the values the others place on the whale, Ishmael is capable of

viewing the whale solely for its being, as one of the many viewpoints that

he considers through the course of the novel. In contrast, Ahab?s views of the whale are singular and focused. Melville

<

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать