Repeal The Second Amendment Essay Research Paper

Repeal The Second Amendment? Essay, Research Paper

Repeal of the Second Amendment

Is repealing the Second Amendment written in the United States Constitution the correct action to take to control violence and unnecessary death due to guns? This is a great idea in a perfect world where everyone on every continent will turn in all there firearms. Our world is not perfect and never will be. America arms itself with the most sophisticated weaponry in the world. The government knows that any nation on any continent, with visions of taking over America?s vast and endless resources as their own, could become an enemy of the United States. The United States was founded to protect itself from enemies trying to take away their newly found prosperity that they had worked hard to earn. By forming a democracy as it?s governing body, the people of the United States stay protected from enemies by means of each and every citizen having the consent to bear arms. A democracy was formed here in the United States by some enlightened individuals, and from this democracy came a doctrine known as The Constitution of the United States of America. To insure the Americans had a means of protecting their freedom, the authors of The Constitution of the United States of America put in a law which states, ?A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed? (Bill 1). There are many opponents to the Second Amendment within the Constitution. These opponents argue that people should not be allowed to own guns because with gun ownership comes senseless deaths and violent crime. They also claim that the Second Amendment is misconstrued, and that the authors meant that only the state could arm the people with guns to stand against an enemy. Some gun control activists even go on to proclaim that a democracy could still be retained without individuals of America having the ability to own guns. To repeal the Second Amendment written in The Constitution of the United States of America would not reduce the number of senseless deaths and democracy founded ?years ago? would come to an end.

* Is repealing the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution the correct action to take to control violence and unnecessary death due to guns? This is a great idea in a perfect world where everyone on every continent will turn in all there firearms. Our world is not perfect and never will be. America is one of the most sovereign and wealthiest countries in the world, due to our democracy, which is based on the United States Constitution. Without the citizens of America having the right to bear arms, stated in the United States Constitution, our country would not be a democracy and the people of America would not reap the benefits of such a wealthy economy.

* It is a tragedy that the United States of America has the problem with guns that it has with all the laws in place to protect the people against these deadly weapons. Something should and must be done to protect the people of the United States against this atrocity. There are laws in place but these laws do not seem to decreasing the death rate due to guns. What could the answer to America?s problem be? Some people, like napoleon at operationusa, think we should repeal the Second Amendment. This action would require all Americans to turn in their guns. This, most people should believe, is a very extreme measure that could put an end to the freedoms Americans have always known, and possibly eradicate our democratic form of government.

There have been arguments entertained throughout America?s history about what the forefathers meant when they introduced the Second Amendment into the United States Constitution. You can see how a few people might misconstrue what the writers were trying to say in the Second Amendment, but it has been proven through the judicial system that the authors meant for the people of the United States to have the ability to own a gun. When President Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore tried to pass a Crime Bill that would take away some gun ownership rights, U.S. Supreme Court District Judge Sam Cummings stated, ?A textual analysis of the Second Amendment supports an individual right to bear arms? (Constitution 3). One argument, conjured by anti Second Amendment activist, is that the authors of the United States Constitution meant that the state had the right to bear arms and not each and every individual citizen of the state. These elite persons would then be armed by the state and organized as a militia, present day National Guard (Repeal 1). When the writers of the Constitution wanted to differentiate the meanings between the state and the people, they clearly distinguish the two by using people to mean the individuals of the state and the word state to mean the state or heads of state. An example of the authors using both the words people and state is in the Tenth Amendment (Constitution 1). ?The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people? (Bill 2). The idea that the writers of the Constitution only meant for the state to be able to arm the people is easily disputed. These great men of history had brilliant vision of how to maintain this democracy.

Gun control activists make several valid points about