Heterdox Essay Research Paper The tradition of

Heterdox Essay, Research Paper

The tradition of heterodox and orthodox take on different meaning when talking of Indian Philosophy, compared with the western Christianity idea of these traditions. To be orthodox, one accepts the testimony of the Vedas, according to Raju. Raju also states that to be a heterodox one does not accept the testimony of the Vedas (Raju 93). The philosophical traditions of Jainism and Buddhism are heterodox traditions, or nastikas (non-existence theorists). The similarities of these two traditions is evident with their rejection to the Vedic authority, which was the standard of the times before the common era. Both Buddhism and Jainism not only have similarities in that they reject the testimony of the Vedas, but other metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical ideals as well.

In Jainism and Buddhism, arising within Brahmanism as non-theistic sectarian movements, the Brahman priesthood and the Vedic caste and sacrifice eliminated. The exclusion of certain Vedic authority such as the worship to the Vedic idea of the Brahman allowed Jainist and Buddhist to secure faith and support in the common people. In the place of rejected Vedic authority, a monastic system was evolved with monks and nuns devoted primarily to rigorous asceticism in the quest of perfection and in pursuit of chastity and truthfulness (Soni 187). Complete detachment from all phenomenal possessions and connections in Jainism made paramount the mendicant life of meditation and spiritual exercise dependant upon the fulfillment of vows of poverty (Tobais 108). The functions of priesthood were sublimated in process of self-salvation, centered around the purpose of the deliverance of a suffering humanity from the cycles of rebirth (Gopalan 51). Since in Buddhism desire was the fundamental burden of existence, priestly intervention and sacrificial offerings were considered as of no avail in the pursuit of the Eightfold path leading to the peace of Nirvana (Mizuno 14).

Buddha himself was not interested in questions of metaphysics, but did enunciate four basic truths. The first truth is that life is misery. Every experience, even pleasure, includes a type of suffering from misery. The second truth is centered around cause. Everything arises from a cause. The implications of cause turned back to the first truth, so therefor misery has a cause. The cause of misery transformed into a twelve link system that brought the cause of misery to the experience that created the world. The third truth states that if every thing has a cause than it follows that the effect can be destroyed if the cause is destroyed, thus the idea of ending the cycle of life to end misery of life and rebirth. The forth truth holds great implications on the ethical views of the Buddhist traditions. This truth give an AEightfold path@ on which one should follow. The eightfold path is a follows: one should; have right knowledge, make right resolve, have right speech, have right conduct, have right livelihood, make right effort, have right mindfulness, and practice the right kind of concentration (Raju 118).

Ethics in Buddhism and Jainism are to similar to distinguish any differences. Right knowledge , faith, and conduct must be cultivated together; none of them con be achieved in the absence of the other (Gopalan 45). Right faith has many implications; it can lead to calmness, kindness, and the renunciation of pride of birth. Right faith leads to perfection only when followed by right conduct. Yet, there can be no virtuous conduct without right knowledge, which consists of clear distinction between the self and the non-self. Knowledge without faith and conduct is futile, according to Gopalan (Gopalan 51). Without purification of mind , all restraints are mere bodily torture. Right conduct is thus spontaneous, not a forced mechanical quality. Attainment of right conduct is ,therefore, a gradual process. Common people can observe only partial self-control, while reaching the level of monk, one is further able to observe more extensive rules of conduct.

Buddha=s teachings were very simple and easy for all types from society to understand. Listeners accepted them without much difficulty and became his disciples (Raju 113). Based on the writings from Kogen Mizuno, one book in particular Basic Buddhist Concepts, I am able to give an account of the broad idea of the Buddhist way of thought. Buddhism is optimistic an enthusiastic towards life. It rejects the principle of fate, though it emphasizes karma. The principle of impermanence and the principle of no-self enlighten us that one should not attach and crave to fame and wealth, not benefit oneself by hurting others. One can enlighten and realize oneself by enlightening and realizing others. Therefore, one has to cultivate and commit oneself in society. Without selfishness, we can really serve society and people. Without the craving and clinging to personal fame and wealth, one can be really free, and comfortable. The principle of Middle Way enlightens people about the interdependent nature of existence, therefore one should not go extreme. The secret of happiness is not doing what people like, but liking things one does (Mizuno 180).

The name Jainism derives from the Sanskrit verb root ji, Ato conquer.@ It refers to the ascetic battle that the Jaina monks must fight against the passions and bodily senses in order to gain omniscience and the co