Con Of Affirmative Action In The United

States Essay, Research Paper

Imagine you are applying for admission to University of Maryland. You have a 3.5 or 3.7 GPA, honors courses, AP classes. 1300, 1400 on the SATs and have a list of after school activities like all state band and Student council. You don t get in. But, an African American with a 1100, 3.0 GPA, and a few minor activities was accepted. Why was he chosen instead of you? Simple. Affirmative Action.

Affirmative action an attempt to create equality throughout society. The goal is that each person receives equal opportunities in the classroom as well as the work force. Not only would these oppurtunities apply to minorities but to women as well. All school admissions and all hiring for jobs would be equal and unprejudiced, or so the advocates say. The reality is that adopting affirmative action would force many employers to replace hard working employees with those of less qualification and experience because of their gender or ethnicity.

Many people feel that affirmative action would be very beneficial to our society. They do have many good arguments. Some claim that we owe blacks for what we took from them in the past. We set them back in our economic system during the 18th and 19th century, and affirmative action would be our way of reimbursing them for time and opportunities they lost out on. But where should the line be drawn? How much do we do to repay people? In this case blacks, for our wrongs? Is it not enough to give them equal rights, or will we give them extra opportunities to make up for those we took away? It has been argued that the black area in the US, in general, is lower in class due to their environment prior to the Civil War, but the black people of today are not those who lived then. Each person today, no matter their gender, origin, race, belief, or whatever difference, has the same opportunities as everyone else. The blacks do not need any special favors, neither do women, Indians, Mexicans, or anyone else.

Advocates of affirmative action attempt to show that diversity in the work force

has brought with it improved skills and new insights. I agree that diversity could encourage the majority to learn more about minorities by forcing them to work side by side. On the other hand, it could also create tension due to the fact that the minorities may replace those who have held a particular job for a long period of time. There would be a feeling of loyalty among those previously employed, and it would only be natural for them to become bitter and regret the minority worker who took the already filled position simply due to their race or gender.

Instead of creating a more unified society, as some would suggest, it is more likely that affirmative action could create more divisions among employees and people in general.

Statistics have shown that affirmative action has found jobs for a larger number

of minorities and women. In 1995, sixty percent of the work force was made up of

minorities and women. That was an increase from the 1979 estimate of forty percent.

In the same way, women s wages increased 119 percent from 1979 to1982. There still remains the question: how much longer should we attempt to right our wrongs? If minorities make up sixty percent of today s work force, will we keep going until it becomes eighty percent, or ninety? Most likely not. It appears that affirmative action has fulfilled its purpose and has now outlasted its usefulness and should be destroyed. Finding jobs for minorities and women was a step in the right direction, but affirmative action was a poor way to do it. Even the Supreme Court, on July 12, 1995, criticized affirmative action saying it was not morally justifiable and could amount to unconstitutional reverse discrimination and harm for those it was seeking to advance.

We spend so much time trying to find equality and unity between whites and those

people of other colors. What about minorities among whites? Should the Irish-Americans

receive the benefits from affirmative action if they are a minority to other Americans?

Basing whether a person receives a job on their race seems a lot like discrimination. It is also discrimination to take jobs and opportunities from white males, who happen to be the majority. It is referred to as reverse discrimination, and while followers of affirmative action say it does not exist, it obviously does. To give a percentage of jobs to the minority, the majority will have to give a percentage of their jobs up. It is generally accepted that discrimination is wrong, and that should include biases against the majority. Not just the minorities.

Not only does affirmative action have a negative effect of ruining social equality in

our country, but also it also changes our economic status. By replacing well-qualified

employees, who happen to be the majority, with minorities who may be less qualified is clearly not good for business. Those in favor claim that affirmative action would increase competition, therefore raising the level of skill among employees. In opposition of that claim, will the majority compete even while knowing they do not have a very good chance at reaching the goal? Psychologists use a term called helplessness. Norton s Book on Psychology by Miriam Elson says, that if a person is not rewarded for their work, he w

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать