Stegner

’s View Of The True Hero Of The West Essay, Research Paper

The West ” home on the range where the deer and the antelope

play; where seldom is heard a discouraging word and the sky is not cloudy all

day.”The romantic idea of the land west of the hundredth meridian has often inspired

songs and poetry, like this one, about idyllic conditions in this dry “paradise.”Often

these ideas did not prove to be completely accurate, and a very few people attempted

to present the facts to the public to dispel the romantic ideas of an effortless

existence in these western lands. John Wesley Powell was one of these people.

Wallace Stegner viewed Powell as a champion for science and one of the true heroes

of this time because he did not follow the romantic ideas that so many of his

contemporaries held about settlement in the West. One of the men Stegner presented

as the epitome of Western romanticism was the Honorable William Gilpin, who eventually

became the first territorial governor of Colorado. Throughout Stegner’s book,

he used Gilpin as a contrast to Powell, who represented science. Gilpin was the

example of the people that Stegner believed to be enamored with the idea of the

West as a huge frontier, able to support millions, without looking at the facts

and examining the situation from a scientist’s point of view. He pointed out several

differences in Powell and Gilpin that illustrate how he believed Powell to be

the hero, even though he was never recognized as one, and Gilpin to be a dreamer.

Stegner gave several examples to prove that the loudest promoters of settlement

were often ignorant of the lands in which they lived, which proved that they were

in fact, unable to determine whether the West was ready to be settled. One of

the examples Stegner used was the fact that Gilpin believed all Indian tribes

to be the same. In his zeal to promote Western settlement, he made the statement

that with settlement in these lands came a unity of the people of the United States.

Native American races were his examples, saying that they exhibited a “perfect

identity in hair, complexion, features, religion, stature, and language”(p. 3).

Powell, however, knew that this was not the case from studying the different races

and using scientific methods. In his studies, he determined that they were, in

fact, very different. He discovered literally hundreds of distinct languages,

peoples of different skin color and eye color, and very different religions and

customs (p. 8). Another example of how inept Gilpin was in determining whether

or not the West could be settled was in his statement that all of the United States

was known to its citizens (p. 2). He disregarded the fact that many maps made

of the West had gaps and empty spaces that no white man had yet explored. Powell

was one of the first to try to fill in the gaps without accepting the idea that

the West was completely known to the United States. He explored several rivers

and many areas of land, taking notes, identifying new plants and animals, and

filling in the blanks on maps that had been forgotten or ignored for one reason

or another. Gilpin attempted to fill in these blanks with romance and claimed

that the West was well-known and was beckoning easterners to settle its vast lands.

Gilpin promoted settlement loudly in the West, making unsupported claims about

the wealth of the area. He claimed that firewood was in abundance underground

and that all settlers had to do was to dig to obtain it (p. 3). They could dig

for water also because, according to him, the West had great underground artesian

wells that would provide enough water for millions of settlers (p. 7). If this

was not enough water, there was always the possibility of irrigation because of

the plentiful water supplies from the melting snow on the mountains. He made the

statement that “agriculture was effortless,”clinging to the idea that “rain followed

the plow”(p. 4). Using these unsupported claims, he declared that there were no

longer any hindrances to settlement on the plains (p. 3). Powell disputed all

of these ideas, using facts to disprove him. He fought in Congress, stating facts

and arguing against the idea of rain following the plow. He also predicted that

out of all the land that they had planned to irrigate, only twelve percent would

be irrigated (p. 343). In his arguments against the great ideas about settlement

on the plains, he stated that the United States government and the Gilpins of

this day were “piling up a heritage of conflict and litigation over water rights

for there is no sufficient water to supply the land.”(p. 343). Powell’s ideas

were not welcome to Gilpin and those like him. When he presented his facts that

did not support settlement, he was booed (p. 343). Those pushing settlement in

the West did not want to hear about the conflicts, the land problems, the water

problems, and

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать