Euthanasia And Living Wills Essay Research Paper

Euthanasia And Living Wills Essay, Research Paper

Euthanasia and Living Wills

THE STORY

Imagine someone you love…better yet, imagine yourself lying in a

hospital bed oblivious to the world around you, unable to move or show any signs

of life, your own existence controlled by an I.V., a respiratory machine, and a

feeding tube. In essence you are dead. Your body is no longer able to sustain

life, its entire purpose is now replaced by a machine – you are being kept alive

by artificial means. At this point the question arises – should you be kept

alive by these means or should you be allowed to die a natural death?

Unfortunately you are unable to answer this question because your voice is

limited to a “beep” on a heart monitor machine. Who then is going to decide if

you live artificially or die naturally? Who gets to play God? Well, if your

family doesn’t have your written consent in the form of a living will, to cease

life support, then the doctor will make the ultimate decision for both you and

your family.

Most often this is the case. Even though writing a living will is just

as easy if not easier than writing a death will, many people don’t take the time

to do so. Therefore, doctors have to debate the question of euthanasia – a

question that each one of us should ponder long before we are put in this

situation.

What is euthanasia? Euthanasia is not mercy killing. It has absolutely

nothing to do with killing. On the contrary, euthanasia by definition simply

means “good death” and in the applied sense it refers to “the patients own

natural death without prolonging their dying process unduly.” What this

attempts to accomplish is to allow a person to die with peace and dignity. In

most cases life-support systems simply prolong the terminal suffering of a

patient by a few more weeks or months, they do nothing to return a patient to a

normal functioning human being. With most terminally ill patients life support

does not mean prolonging life – it means prolonging suffering, for both the

patient and their family.

Although there are no statutes legalizing euthanasia in the U.S. many

doctors end a terminal patients life by administering a fatal dose of a drug

that they were previously administering. Furthermore, most hospitals knowing

that there is little or no hope for a terminal patient, provide less than

adequate attention and care to them.

A living will makes the possibility of this entire situation virtually

non-existent. A living will is the patient’s written request not the doctor’s

decision, not to be placed on life-support systems, and this request must be

honored by the doctor. Just as property is proportionated to those named in a

person’s death will, so must their requests be recognized in a living will.

If a person has a living will written then if it is so stated, they will

not be placed on life-support. Instead, they will either stay in the hospital

or be sent home so that their body will be allowed to take the natural course it

has begun. If a body, nature, God, or who-be-it, has decided that it is a

person’s “time” then who are we to say that it isn’t? Obviously, we are in

neither a spiritual nor a moral position to make this decision. Therefore, we

should not implement artificial life-support methods to either prevent or delay

the body’s natural degenerative process. Instead, we should face and overcome

our own fears and internal conflicts with death. And one way to do this is by

writing a living will.

Living wills help medical staff and others to make decisions about your

care and treatment should you become seriously ill and unable to speak for

yourself. In some circumstances, living wills may become legally binding on

health care staff. Living wills are considered clear and convincing evidence of

a person’s preferences for end-of-life treatment (see attached forms).

MEDICAL BACKGROUND

From the advent of medicine the ultimate goal for physicians was to

maintain life. The death of a patient became a sign of a physician’s defeat,

the prolonging of life a sign of his or her ability. Although this philosophy

still continues new variables were added to the equation in the 1960s.

During this decade modern technology began to produce machines such a

lung and heart machines capable of taking over normal body functions for long

periods of time. These machines were intended for temporary use until the

normal organ function could be restored and the patient could return to normal

life. But the machines also created two problems.

First, because prolonging life became an end in itself, some physicians

employed these machines even in situations in which there was no hope of the

patient ever returning to a meaningful life.

Second, even those physicians who avoided unwarranted use of the

machines found that emerg

Внимание, отключите Adblock

Вы посетили наш сайт со включенным блокировщиком рекламы!
Ссылка для скачивания станет доступной сразу после отключения Adblock!

Скачать